Nnamdi Kanu: FG Finally Drags IPOB Leader to Supreme Court, Files 7 Grounds against Appeal Court Judgement

  • The federal government has finally dragged the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, to the Supreme Court
  • Kanu had got a favourable judgement against the federal government when the Court of Appeal discharged him
  • The government has, however, filed grounds of appeal against the appellate court verdict and also sought a stay of execution of the judgment

FCT, Abuja – The federal government has filed seven grounds of appeal at the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeal judgment which discharged the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

The government asked the apex court to set aside the judgment and restore the charge against Kanu to be tried at the trial court.

DSS operatives escort IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu outside the Federal High Court during his trial in Abuja, Nigeria, on October 21, 2021. Photo credit: KOLA SULAIMON/AFP Source: Getty Images

The Nigerian government is also seeking a stay of execution of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, pending the hearing and final determination of its appeal, noting that the IPOB leader posed a flight risk.

According to The Punch, the federal government’s notice of appeal dated October 18 was signed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation, Mohammed Abubakar, Assistant Chief State Counsel, D. Kaswe and A. Aluko and Senior State Counsel, G. Nweze, Department of Public Prosecution, Federal Ministry of Justice.

The federal government also averred that the Court of Appeal erred in law when it held that the trial court had no jurisdiction to try Kanu because of “the extraordinary rendition of the respondent.”

“There was no evidence led by the respondent before the court of the first instance and indeed before the court below to show how he was allegedly abducted and rendered to Nigeria as required by Section 139 of the Evidence Act, 2011 since he alleged that he was abducted without following due process of law,” it stated.

On Nnamdi Kanu’s alleged abduction

The federal government also contended that the appellate court erred when it held that the executive arm must not be allowed to benefit from the alleged abduction of Kanu “when in fact and by its judgment, the respondent was allowed to benefit from his illegality of disobeying the orders of the court when he jumped bail and was rewarded with a discharge from the charges pending against him at the trial court thereby occasioning a m*iscarriage of justice against the state and the victims of the crimes perpetrated by the respondent.”

The government also claimed that the appeal court was wrong by saying that how Kanu was brought back to the country could vitiate and weaken the criminal charges of treason, treasonable felony and terrorism brought against him.

It added that the lower court made that decision without taking into account the fact that the nature of the “entry’’ of the respondent is not relevant in the determination of the charges against him.

Appeal court errs by discharging Kanu, says FG

The federal government further argued that the court below erred in law when it discharged the respondent of the offences mentioned in counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 15 bordering on terrorism offences contained in the amended charge dated January 14, 2022, and retained by the trial court for want of jurisdiction.

The appeal observed that the appellate court was completely silent and closed its eyes to the obvious fact of the issues which predate the rendition of the respondent because he was standing trial for conspiracy, and treasonable felony terrorism before his escape.

The FG also stated that Kanu has a history of jumping bail and may be difficult to secure if the appeal was not granted.

Written by Grandbros

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Anambra state govt shuts down all casinos and gaming centres over ‘criminal activities’

US court fixes date for sentencing of Air Peace founder Allen Onyema’s co-conspirator